Central African Republic
Asylum decisions for applicants of this nationality across all U.S. immigration courts.
EOIR data through August 31, 2026 · built September 11, 2026 · What these dates mean
52%
Asylum grant rate
of 328 decisions · FY1986–FY2026
95% interval: 46% — 57%
- granted:
- 170
- denied:
- 158
How this percentage is calculated
Grant rate = granted / (granted + denied). Administrative closures, withdrawals, abandonment and "not adjudicated" are excluded from the denominator. What is counted is a decision per proceeding, not per application: asylum, withholding and CAT protection are almost always asked for together, so withholding and CAT grants are counted separately from asylum. The U.S. fiscal year runs October 1 – September 30.
How this compares
- Central African Republic52% (328)
- All U.S. courts33% (1,369,763)
This comparison does not adjust for which cases a judge was given: judges see different nationalities, different shares of detained respondents, and different rates of legal representation. A difference in percentages does not by itself mean identical cases were treated differently.
Trend by fiscal year
U.S. fiscal year: October 1 – September 30.
Years with fewer than 10 decisions are not plotted (20): at that sample size the percentage is noise. They remain in the table.
Show as a table
| Period | decisions | granted | 95% interval |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026partial | 6 | 17% | 3% — 56% |
| FY2025 | 5 | 40% | 12% — 77% |
| FY2024 | 3 | 67% | 21% — 94% |
| FY2023 | 7 | 71% | 36% — 92% |
| FY2022 | 2 | 50% | 9% — 91% |
| FY2021 | 2 | 100% | 34% — 100% |
| FY2020 | 7 | 71% | 36% — 92% |
| FY2019 | 5 | 40% | 12% — 77% |
| FY2018 | 13 | 92% | 67% — 99% |
| FY2017 | 10 | 90% | 60% — 98% |
| FY2016 | 10 | 60% | 31% — 83% |
| FY2015 | 6 | 67% | 30% — 90% |
| FY2014 | 7 | 71% | 36% — 92% |
| FY2013 | 10 | 70% | 40% — 89% |
| FY2012 | 8 | 63% | 31% — 86% |
| FY2011 | 13 | 23% | 8% — 50% |
| FY2010 | 15 | 73% | 48% — 89% |
| FY2009 | 24 | 67% | 47% — 82% |
| FY2008 | 19 | 68% | 46% — 85% |
| FY2007 | 22 | 59% | 39% — 77% |
| FY2006 | 30 | 33% | 19% — 51% |
| FY2005 | 32 | 56% | 39% — 72% |
| FY2004 | 23 | 9% | 2% — 27% |
| FY2003 | 23 | 39% | 22% — 59% |
| FY2002 | 4 | 50% | 15% — 85% |
| FY2001 | 4 | 75% | 30% — 95% |
| FY2000 | 2 | 0% | 0% — 66% |
| FY1999 | 4 | 50% | 15% — 85% |
| FY1998 | 6 | 0% | 0% — 39% |
| FY1997 | 1 | 0% | 0% — 79% |
| FY1994 | 1 | 0% | 0% — 79% |
| FY1993 | 1 | 0% | 0% — 79% |
| FY1986 | 3 | 0% | 0% — 56% |
Where these cases are heard
Courts by number of decisions for this nationality. Ordered by volume, not by percentage.
| Court | decisions | granted | 95% interval |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baltimore Immigration Court | 83 | 52% | 41% — 62% |
| New York Immigration Court | 76 | 58% | 47% — 68% |
| Cleveland Immigration Court | 29 | 52% | 34% — 69% |
| Memphis Immigration Court | 23 | 13% | 5% — 32% |
| Annandale Immigration Court | 17 | 76% | 53% — 90% |
| Philadelphia Immigration Court | 13 | 77% | 50% — 92% |
| Denver Immigration Court | 8 | 63% | 31% — 86% |
| Newark Immigration Court | 8 | 75% | 41% — 93% |
| Houston Immigration Court | 5 | 80% | 38% — 96% |
| Boston Immigration Court | 4 | 50% | 15% — 85% |
| Hyattsville Immigration Court | 4 | 50% | 15% — 85% |
| Dallas Immigration Court | 4 | 50% | 15% — 85% |
| San Antonio Immigration Court | 3 | 67% | 21% — 94% |
| Tucson Immigration Court | 3 | 67% | 21% — 94% |
| Seattle Immigration Court | 3 | 33% | 6% — 79% |
| Omaha Immigration Court | 3 | 67% | 21% — 94% |
| Pearsall Immigration Court | 2 | 50% | 9% — 91% |
| Elizabeth Immigration Court | 2 | 50% | 9% — 91% |
| Chicago Immigration Court | 2 | 50% | 9% — 91% |
| Tacoma Immigration Court | 2 | 50% | 9% — 91% |
| Detroit Immigration Court | 2 | 50% | 9% — 91% |
The queue
Proceedings of applicants of this nationality with no decision yet.
32 mo
already waited, median
from the NTA to the data cutoff
half of proceedings: 13—59 mo
proceedings in the queue: 63
- 73% of them have a hearing scheduled later than the date this data was collected. The rest have no upcoming event in the release.
The queue counts proceedings with no decision yet in the release. It is how long people have already waited, not how much longer they will.
How this is counted
Shown separately is the share with a hearing scheduled after the cutoff: the rest have no future event in the release at all, and cannot be read as live alongside these.
How to cite this page
Figures on this page belong to one monthly release and are replaced whole by the next. The release label and the data cutoff are part of the citation for that reason: without them the number cannot be checked later.
Asylum Beacon. Central African Republic. EOIR Case Data, U.S. DOJ FOIA Library, release 2026-08, data through 2026-08-31. https://asylumbeacon.com/en/nationality/CT
Data comes from the monthly EOIR Case Data release (U.S. DOJ FOIA Library). This service is not affiliated with the U.S. government and does not give legal advice. The release lags by roughly a month, so check ACIS or Respondent Access for your current case status. The source has known gaps, including among relief applications: if something is missing here, that does not mean it is missing from your case.