Skip to content
Asylum BeaconU.S. immigration court data

Judges: Y

11 judges

Lists are ordered by number of decisions, not by grant rate: a best-to-worst ranking of this data would mislead.

EOIR data through August 31, 2026 · built September 11, 2026 · What these dates mean

Judges with fewer than 50 decisions are not listed: at that sample size the percentage is noise rather than a characteristic. Their pages still open by direct link.

U.S. immigration judges: volume and asylum grant rate
JudgeCourtDecisionsGranted95% interval
Yates, Clarease RankinNothing scheduledHouston Immigration Court3,03119%17% — 20%
Yeargin, RobertNot hearing casesSan Francisco Immigration Court1,31732%29% — 34%
Yamaguchi, Michael J.Not hearing casesSan Francisco Immigration Court1,12838%36% — 41%
Yeomans, Sarah Beth.Sterling96530%27% — 33%
Yam, MimiNot hearing casesSan Francisco Immigration Court90331%28% — 34%
Young, Elizabeth L.Not hearing casesSan Francisco Immigration Court69571%67% — 74%
Yarbrough, SusanNot hearing casesConroe Immigration Court65015%12% — 18%
Young, Victoria E.Not hearing casesTacoma Immigration Court24124%19% — 30%
Yokoyama, LoriChicago Immigration Court13011%7% — 17%
Ybarra, Jesus Juan.Laredo Immigration Court671%<1% — 8%
Yeh, LianHouston Immigration Courtpreviously Oakdale Immigration Court510%0% — 7%
How this percentage is calculated

Grant rate = granted / (granted + denied). Administrative closures, withdrawals, abandonment and "not adjudicated" are excluded from the denominator. What is counted is a decision per proceeding, not per application: asylum, withholding and CAT protection are almost always asked for together, so withholding and CAT grants are counted separately from asylum. The U.S. fiscal year runs October 1 – September 30.