Skip to content
Asylum BeaconU.S. immigration court data

Judge Malloy, Rosalind K.

PHILADELPHIA — IMMIGRATION COURT

No hearings scheduled ahead

Last hearing
January 22, 2025
Next hearing
none scheduled
Last decision
February 29, 2024
Courts worked at: 6

Worked here before

The periods overlap, and that is not an error: a judge hears cases at a new court while still closing out old ones at the previous one. Each row answers "when did this judge work here", not "from when to when did they serve here".

Status is derived from the court calendar: whether the judge has hearings scheduled after the release cutoff. The EOIR release carries no personnel data, so retirement, removal, elevation to the BIA and extended absence cannot be told apart — only what the data shows is stated here. Hearings are scheduled two to three years out, so an empty calendar for a working judge is rare; for judges who went quiet in the last few months it may still be an artifact of the cutoff, which lags by about a month. The lookup table's "active" flag is not used: it disagrees with the calendar for a third of judges.

36%

Asylum grant rate

of 2,634 decisions · FY1971–FY2023

95% interval: 34%38%

granted:
952
denied:
1,682

The period has closed

This judge no longer hears cases, so the figure describes FY1971–FY2023 — not what happens in the court today. Asylum rules and the mix of cases have changed since.

How this percentage is calculated
Grant rate = granted / (granted + denied). Administrative closures, withdrawals, abandonment and "not adjudicated" are excluded from the denominator. The unit of count is a decision per proceeding, not per application: applicants almost always file asylum, withholding and CAT protection together. Withholding and CAT grants are counted separately from asylum. U.S. fiscal year: October 1 – September 30.

How this compares

  • This judge36% (2,634)
  • The whole court — PHILADELPHIA — IMMIGRATION COURT34% (21,140)
  • All U.S. courts33% (1,350,724)

This comparison does not adjust for which cases a judge was given: judges see different nationalities, different shares of detained respondents, and different rates of legal representation. A difference in percentages does not by itself mean identical cases were treated differently.

Trend by fiscal year

0%25%50%75%100%1999200220062010201420182022

U.S. fiscal year: October 1 – September 30.

Years with fewer than 10 decisions are not plotted (7): at that sample size the percentage is noise. They remain in the table.

Show as a table
Grant rate by fiscal year
Perioddecisionsgranted95% interval
FY202310%0%79%
FY20221436%16%61%
FY20212463%43%79%
FY202012437%29%46%
FY201917033%26%40%
FY20187858%47%68%
FY20174768%54%80%
FY20162785%68%94%
FY20153866%50%79%
FY20145064%50%76%
FY20134871%57%82%
FY20126569%57%79%
FY20116652%40%63%
FY20106136%25%49%
FY20097745%35%57%
FY20088647%36%57%
FY200717332%26%40%
FY200628013%9%17%
FY200521420%15%25%
FY200421824%19%30%
FY200325238%32%44%
FY200215539%32%47%
FY200111342%34%52%
FY200013233%25%41%
FY19999528%20%38%
FY1998922%6%55%
FY199790%0%30%
FY199620%0%66%
FY199410%0%79%
FY199130%0%56%
FY199020%0%66%

By applicant nationality

Grant rate by nationality, largest volumes first
Nationalitydecisionsgranted95% interval
INDONESIA55914%11%17%
CHINA39338%33%43%
GUATEMALA22330%24%36%
PAKISTAN8955%45%65%
EL SALVADOR7125%17%37%
MEXICO676%2%14%
COLOMBIA6659%47%70%
HONDURAS5922%13%34%
LIBERIA5975%62%84%
INDIA5441%29%54%
ARMENIA5032%21%46%
HAITI4738%26%53%
ALBANIA4439%26%53%
GUINEA4269%54%81%
RUSSIA3845%30%60%

How long a case takes

How long it took from service of the NTA to the decision on the application, for the cases this judge has already finished.

29 mo

median

half of cases: 17—43 mo

based on 2,634 cases

NTA-to-decision duration by fiscal year
Decided inCasesmedianhalf of cases, mo
FY202012442 mo3753
FY201917045 mo3660
FY20187845 mo3250
FY20174737 mo2747
FY20153834 mo2766
FY20145046 mo2579
FY20134850 mo3780
FY20126547 mo2788
FY20116636 mo2653
FY20106136 mo2471

Duration runs from the NTA date (charging document served) to the decision on the application. Median, not mean: the distribution has a long right tail. Cases decided this year may have begun a decade ago, so duration by year of decision is not a forecast for a case filed today.

The queue

Cases with no decision yet. A different figure from the duration of completed cases: quick cases leave the queue first, so the long ones accumulate among those still waiting.

No undecided cases in this release.

What became of appeals to the BIA

An immigration judge's decision can be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals. This is what the Board did with those appeals. A high share of reversals and remands tells a different story than a low grant rate alone.

What became of appeals to the BIA
BIA decisionAppeals
Dismiss Appeal/Affirm IJ's Decision620
Denied499
Remand496
Dismissed (Voluntary Departure Granted)300
SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE/VD236
Summary Affirmance209
Dismissed (Grant V/D 30 days)112
Termination85
Background Check Remand76
Withdrawal of Appeal62
Lacks Jurisdiction - BIA52
Other44
Summarily Dismiss38
Granted26
Sustain21
Temporary Protected Status20
Coercive Population Control12
Dismiss as Untimely7
Grant with no Remand6
Terminate-DHS PD5
Summary Dismissal (e) no brief4
Administratively Closed4
Administratively Closed-DHS PD4
SUMMARY DISMISSAL - BOTH (a) & (e)3
Withdrawal-DHS PD3
Continued3
ROP Returned to Court to correct deficiency1
Final Denial of EOIR 42B/401
Summary Dismissal (G) untimely or waived appeal1
Summary Dismissal (o) Other1

Data comes from the monthly EOIR Case Data release (U.S. DOJ FOIA Library). This service is not affiliated with the U.S. government and does not provide legal advice. The data lags by roughly a month; for current case status use ACIS and Respondent Access. The source is known to have missing records, including relief applications — absent data does not mean it is absent from your case.