Skip to content
Asylum BeaconU.S. immigration court data

Judge Gordon-Uruakpa, Vivienne E.

NEW YORK — IMMIGRATION COURT

Hearing cases: hearings are scheduled

Last hearing
July 29, 2026
Next hearing
August 4, 2026 · 3,804 scheduled in all
Last decision
July 16, 2026
Courts worked at: 8

Hearings scheduled here

Worked here before

The periods overlap, and that is not an error: a judge hears cases at a new court while still closing out old ones at the previous one. Each row answers "when did this judge work here", not "from when to when did they serve here".

Status is derived from the court calendar: whether the judge has hearings scheduled after the release cutoff. The EOIR release carries no personnel data, so retirement, removal, elevation to the BIA and extended absence cannot be told apart — only what the data shows is stated here. Hearings are scheduled two to three years out, so an empty calendar for a working judge is rare; for judges who went quiet in the last few months it may still be an artifact of the cutoff, which lags by about a month. The lookup table's "active" flag is not used: it disagrees with the calendar for a third of judges.

83%

Asylum grant rate

of 5,593 decisions · FY1990–FY2026

95% interval: 82%84%

granted:
4,636
denied:
957
How this percentage is calculated
Grant rate = granted / (granted + denied). Administrative closures, withdrawals, abandonment and "not adjudicated" are excluded from the denominator. The unit of count is a decision per proceeding, not per application: applicants almost always file asylum, withholding and CAT protection together. Withholding and CAT grants are counted separately from asylum. U.S. fiscal year: October 1 – September 30.

How this compares

  • This judge83% (5,593)
  • The whole court — NEW YORK — IMMIGRATION COURT57% (230,016)
  • All U.S. courts33% (1,350,724)

This comparison does not adjust for which cases a judge was given: judges see different nationalities, different shares of detained respondents, and different rates of legal representation. A difference in percentages does not by itself mean identical cases were treated differently.

Trend by fiscal year

0%25%50%75%100%199720062011201620212026

U.S. fiscal year: October 1 – September 30.

FY2026 is incomplete: the release covers only 10 of its 12 months. Its point is drawn hollow and the segment leading to it is dashed.

Years with fewer than 10 decisions are not plotted (10): at that sample size the percentage is noise. They remain in the table.

Show as a table
Grant rate by fiscal year
Perioddecisionsgranted95% interval
FY2026partial186%1%26%
FY202512088%80%92%
FY202418594%89%96%
FY202317093%88%96%
FY202215891%86%95%
FY20214185%72%93%
FY202013187%80%92%
FY201927572%67%77%
FY201821086%80%90%
FY201714597%92%99%
FY201617697%93%98%
FY201525393%90%96%
FY201425687%82%91%
FY201324088%84%92%
FY201230091%87%94%
FY201130888%84%91%
FY201025883%78%87%
FY200926776%71%81%
FY200829480%75%84%
FY200733179%74%83%
FY200643579%75%83%
FY200531379%74%83%
FY200432683%79%87%
FY200331370%64%74%
FY20022322%10%42%
FY200120%0%66%
FY200050%0%43%
FY199960%0%39%
FY199880%0%32%
FY1997100%0%28%
FY199630%0%56%
FY199550%0%43%
FY199420%0%66%
FY199320%0%66%
FY199220%0%66%
FY199020%0%66%

By applicant nationality

Grant rate by nationality, largest volumes first
Nationalitydecisionsgranted95% interval
CHINA3,16487%85%88%
INDIA23185%80%89%
ALBANIA17688%82%92%
NEPAL16394%89%97%
BANGLADESH12783%76%89%
Former Countries12796%91%98%
GUINEA12177%69%83%
EL SALVADOR10445%36%55%
PAKISTAN8363%52%72%
RUSSIA7395%87%98%
INDONESIA6779%68%87%
GUATEMALA6638%27%50%
Former Countries6572%60%82%
IVORY COAST (COTE D'IVOIRE)6475%63%84%
SRI LANKA5686%74%93%

How long a case takes

How long it took from service of the NTA to the decision on the application, for the cases this judge has already finished.

24 mo

median

half of cases: 13—40 mo

based on 5,593 cases

NTA-to-decision duration by fiscal year
Decided inCasesmedianhalf of cases, mo
FY202512027 mo1974
FY202418525 mo1777
FY202317050 mo4282
FY202215843 mo4156
FY20214144 mo4065
FY202013142 mo3553
FY201927547 mo3555
FY201821042 mo3750
FY201714538 mo3448
FY201617635 mo3241

Duration runs from the NTA date (charging document served) to the decision on the application. Median, not mean: the distribution has a long right tail. Cases decided this year may have begun a decade ago, so duration by year of decision is not a forecast for a case filed today.

The queue

Cases with no decision yet. A different figure from the duration of completed cases: quick cases leave the queue first, so the long ones accumulate among those still waiting.

4,622
cases waiting
36 mo
already waited, median
  • Half have waited between 30 mo and 51 mo.
  • 2,728 (59%) have a hearing scheduled later than the date this data was collected. The rest have no upcoming event in the release.

The queue counts proceedings with no decision in the release. The figure runs from the NTA date to the release cutoff — it is how long people have already waited, not how much longer they will. Shown separately: how many have a hearing scheduled after the cutoff. The rest have no upcoming event in the release and should not be read alongside live cases.

What became of appeals to the BIA

An immigration judge's decision can be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals. This is what the Board did with those appeals. A high share of reversals and remands tells a different story than a low grant rate alone.

What became of appeals to the BIA
BIA decisionAppeals
Dismiss Appeal/Affirm IJ's Decision429
Denied217
Remand205
Summary Affirmance127
Background Check Remand82
Termination76
Lacks Jurisdiction - BIA37
Sustain34
Withdrawal of Appeal25
Summarily Dismiss13
Summary Dismissal (e) no brief13
Dismissed (Voluntary Departure Granted)12
SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE/VD10
Dismissed (Grant V/D 30 days)9
Other8
Terminate-DHS PD5
Temporary Protected Status4
Grant with no Remand4
Granted4
Coercive Population Control4
Administratively Closed-DHS PD2
ROP Returned to Court to correct deficiency1
Administratively Closed1
Dismiss as Untimely1
Moot Bond1

Data comes from the monthly EOIR Case Data release (U.S. DOJ FOIA Library). This service is not affiliated with the U.S. government and does not provide legal advice. The data lags by roughly a month; for current case status use ACIS and Respondent Access. The source is known to have missing records, including relief applications — absent data does not mean it is absent from your case.