Skip to content
Asylum BeaconU.S. immigration court data

Soviet Union

Asylum decisions for applicants of this nationality across all U.S. immigration courts.

EOIR data through August 31, 2026 · built September 11, 2026 · What these dates mean

81%

Asylum grant rate

of 4,206 decisions · FY1967–FY2026

95% interval: 79% — 82%

granted:
3,390
denied:
816
How this percentage is calculated

Grant rate = granted / (granted + denied). Administrative closures, withdrawals, abandonment and "not adjudicated" are excluded from the denominator. What is counted is a decision per proceeding, not per application: asylum, withholding and CAT protection are almost always asked for together, so withholding and CAT grants are counted separately from asylum. The U.S. fiscal year runs October 1 – September 30.

How this compares

  • Soviet Union81% (4,206)
  • All U.S. courts33% (1,369,763)

This comparison does not adjust for which cases a judge was given: judges see different nationalities, different shares of detained respondents, and different rates of legal representation. A difference in percentages does not by itself mean identical cases were treated differently.

Trend by fiscal year

0%25%50%75%100%198919972008201420202026

U.S. fiscal year: October 1 – September 30.

FY2026 is incomplete: the release covers only 11 of its 12 months. Its point is drawn hollow and the segment leading to it is dashed.

Years with fewer than 10 decisions are not plotted (11): at that sample size the percentage is noise. They remain in the table.

Show as a table
Grant rate by fiscal year
Perioddecisionsgranted95% interval
FY2026partial2719%8% — 37%
FY20254358%43% — 72%
FY20249892%85% — 96%
FY202315992%87% — 95%
FY202218991%86% — 94%
FY20214486%73% — 94%
FY202013988%81% — 92%
FY201918086%80% — 90%
FY201813687%80% — 91%
FY201713991%85% — 94%
FY201614793%87% — 96%
FY201518489%84% — 93%
FY201418593%88% — 96%
FY201327290%86% — 93%
FY201229789%85% — 92%
FY201125288%84% — 92%
FY201019082%76% — 87%
FY200916880%73% — 85%
FY200821279%73% — 84%
FY200724477%71% — 82%
FY200625175%69% — 80%
FY200525965%59% — 70%
FY200413763%54% — 70%
FY20032774%55% — 87%
FY2002540%12% — 77%
FY2001667%30% — 90%
FY2000911%2% — 44%
FY1999520%4% — 62%
FY1998743%16% — 75%
FY19971136%15% — 65%
FY19961233%14% — 61%
FY19951953%32% — 73%
FY19942467%47% — 82%
FY19933023%12% — 41%
FY19923415%6% — 30%
FY19913030%17% — 48%
FY1990540%12% — 77%
FY19891533%15% — 58%
FY1988425%5% — 70%
FY19877100%65% — 100%
FY198620%0% — 66%
FY19851100%21% — 100%
FY198310%0% — 79%

Where these cases are heard

Courts by number of decisions for this nationality. Ordered by volume, not by percentage.

Where these cases are heard
Courtdecisionsgranted95% interval
New York Immigration Court2,86890%88% — 91%
San Francisco Immigration Court36862%57% — 67%
West Los Angeles Immigration Court22557%50% — 63%
New York Immigration Court13586%79% — 91%
Seattle Immigration Court9664%54% — 72%
Newark Immigration Court5753%40% — 65%
Boston Immigration Court5454%41% — 66%
Philadelphia Immigration Court5078%65% — 87%
Miami Immigration Court4045%31% — 60%
New York Immigration Court3174%57% — 86%
Baltimore Immigration Court2857%39% — 73%
Cleveland Immigration Court2433%18% — 53%
Chicago Immigration Court2055%34% — 74%
Las Vegas Immigration Court1963%41% — 81%
Orlando Immigration Court1968%46% — 85%
Annandale Immigration Court1788%66% — 97%
San Diego Immigration Court1567%42% — 85%
New Orleans Immigration Court1338%18% — 64%
Van Nuys Immigration Court1354%29% — 77%
Charlotte Immigration Court1155%28% — 79%
Denver Immigration Court1145%21% — 72%
Portland Immigration Court1030%11% — 60%
Hartford Immigration Court786%49% — 97%
Phoenix Immigration Court633%10% — 70%
Buffalo Immigration Court580%38% — 96%

The queue

Proceedings of applicants of this nationality with no decision yet.

105 mo

already waited, median

from the NTA to the data cutoff

half of proceedings: 100—118 mo

proceedings in the queue: 358

  • 77% of them have a hearing scheduled later than the date this data was collected. The rest have no upcoming event in the release.

The queue counts proceedings with no decision yet in the release. It is how long people have already waited, not how much longer they will.

How this is counted

Shown separately is the share with a hearing scheduled after the cutoff: the rest have no future event in the release at all, and cannot be read as live alongside these.

Judges with the most such cases

At least 50 decisions for this nationality. This is not a ranking: judges hear different mixes of cases even within one country.

Judges with the most such cases
Judgedecisionsgranted95% interval
Bain, Terry A.13696%92% — 98%
Gordon-Uruakpa, Vivienne E.12796%91% — 98%
Nelson, Barbara A.11384%76% — 90%
Laforest, Brigitte11187%80% — 92%
Sichel, Helen10298%93% — 99%
Rohan, Patricia A.10187%79% — 92%
Hom, Sandy10057%47% — 66%
Morace, Philip L.9894%87% — 97%
Schoppert, Douglas B.9798%93% — 99%
Chew, George T.9791%83% — 95%
Lamb, Elizabeth A.9597%91% — 99%
Brennan, Noel A.9196%89% — 98%
Zagzoug, Randa8394%87% — 97%
Mcmanus, Margaret8096%90% — 99%
Balasquide, Javier E.7297%90% — 99%
Cheng, Mary6997%90% — 99%
Leeds, Frederic G.6498%92% — >99%
Poczter, Aviva L.6285%75% — 92%
Loprest, F. James, JR.6092%82% — 96%
Christensen, Jesse B.6085%74% — 92%
Segal, Alice5290%79% — 96%
Mulligan, Thomas J.5192%81% — 97%
Elstein, Annette S.5186%74% — 93%
How to cite this page

Figures on this page belong to one monthly release and are replaced whole by the next. The release label and the data cutoff are part of the citation for that reason: without them the number cannot be checked later.

Asylum Beacon. Soviet Union. EOIR Case Data, U.S. DOJ FOIA Library, release 2026-08, data through 2026-08-31. https://asylumbeacon.com/en/nationality/UR

Methodology in full

Data comes from the monthly EOIR Case Data release (U.S. DOJ FOIA Library). This service is not affiliated with the U.S. government and does not give legal advice. The release lags by roughly a month, so check ACIS or Respondent Access for your current case status. The source has known gaps, including among relief applications: if something is missing here, that does not mean it is missing from your case.