Skip to content
Asylum BeaconU.S. immigration court data

Cameroon

Asylum decisions for applicants of this nationality across all U.S. immigration courts.

EOIR data through August 31, 2026 · built September 11, 2026 · What these dates mean

62%

Asylum grant rate

of 13,709 decisions · FY1975–FY2026

95% interval: 61% — 62%

granted:
8,437
denied:
5,272
How this percentage is calculated

Grant rate = granted / (granted + denied). Administrative closures, withdrawals, abandonment and "not adjudicated" are excluded from the denominator. What is counted is a decision per proceeding, not per application: asylum, withholding and CAT protection are almost always asked for together, so withholding and CAT grants are counted separately from asylum. The U.S. fiscal year runs October 1 – September 30.

How this compares

  • Cameroon62% (13,709)
  • All U.S. courts33% (1,369,763)

This comparison does not adjust for which cases a judge was given: judges see different nationalities, different shares of detained respondents, and different rates of legal representation. A difference in percentages does not by itself mean identical cases were treated differently.

Trend by fiscal year

0%25%50%75%100%199320022008201420202026

U.S. fiscal year: October 1 – September 30.

FY2026 is incomplete: the release covers only 11 of its 12 months. Its point is drawn hollow and the segment leading to it is dashed.

Years with fewer than 10 decisions are not plotted (5): at that sample size the percentage is noise. They remain in the table.

Show as a table
Grant rate by fiscal year
Perioddecisionsgranted95% interval
FY2026partial1,01631%28% — 34%
FY20251,18145%42% — 48%
FY202489671%68% — 74%
FY202365078%74% — 81%
FY202250788%85% — 90%
FY202139381%77% — 85%
FY20201,82459%56% — 61%
FY201989581%78% — 83%
FY201847071%67% — 75%
FY201732771%66% — 76%
FY201616675%68% — 81%
FY201514769%62% — 76%
FY201415782%75% — 87%
FY201323871%65% — 77%
FY201224576%70% — 80%
FY201125480%74% — 84%
FY201025778%72% — 82%
FY200929272%66% — 76%
FY200825762%56% — 68%
FY200734160%55% — 65%
FY200652468%64% — 72%
FY200550452%48% — 56%
FY200457348%44% — 52%
FY200344642%37% — 46%
FY200226843%37% — 49%
FY200124854%48% — 61%
FY200016155%48% — 63%
FY199912543%35% — 52%
FY199810959%49% — 68%
FY19978360%49% — 70%
FY19965643%31% — 56%
FY19955244%32% — 58%
FY19942442%24% — 61%
FY19931233%14% — 61%
FY199240%0% — 49%
FY199130%0% — 56%
FY199010%0% — 79%
FY198910%0% — 79%
FY198620%0% — 66%

Where these cases are heard

Courts by number of decisions for this nationality. Ordered by volume, not by percentage.

Where these cases are heard
Courtdecisionsgranted95% interval
Baltimore Immigration Court3,19459%58% — 61%
Hyattsville Immigration Court1,79561%58% — 63%
Annandale Immigration Court1,10075%72% — 77%
Adelanto Immigration Court45068%64% — 72%
Jena Immigration Court40941%36% — 45%
Fort Snelling Immigration Court32656%51% — 62%
Dallas Immigration Court31948%42% — 53%
Chicago Immigration Court31078%73% — 82%
Boston Immigration Court27473%68% — 78%
Oakdale Immigration Court27147%41% — 53%
Tacoma Immigration Court25972%66% — 77%
Otay Mesa Immigration Court25766%60% — 72%
Houston Immigration Court25357%51% — 63%
Cleveland Immigration Court24348%42% — 54%
Aurora Immigration Court23275%70% — 81%
Conroe Immigration Court22956%50% — 63%
New York Immigration Court19880%74% — 85%
Pearsall Immigration Court19356%49% — 63%
San Francisco Immigration Court17281%74% — 86%
Elizabeth Immigration Court16262%54% — 69%
Imperial Immigration Court15865%57% — 72%
Lumpkin Immigration Court14440%32% — 48%
Philadelphia Immigration Court14268%60% — 75%
West Los Angeles Immigration Court14273%65% — 80%
San Antonio Immigration Court14172%64% — 79%

The queue

Proceedings of applicants of this nationality with no decision yet.

30 mo

already waited, median

from the NTA to the data cutoff

half of proceedings: 20—42 mo

proceedings in the queue: 5,260

  • 76% of them have a hearing scheduled later than the date this data was collected. The rest have no upcoming event in the release.

The queue counts proceedings with no decision yet in the release. It is how long people have already waited, not how much longer they will.

How this is counted

Shown separately is the share with a hearing scheduled after the cutoff: the rest have no future event in the release at all, and cannot be read as live alongside these.

Judges with the most such cases

At least 50 decisions for this nationality. This is not a ranking: judges hear different mixes of cases even within one country.

Judges with the most such cases
Judgedecisionsgranted95% interval
Dornell, Lisa62761%57% — 65%
Barrett, Bruce M.45139%35% — 44%
Gossart, John F., JR.40848%43% — 53%
Dufresne, Jill H.36836%31% — 41%
Williams, Phillip T.31978%73% — 82%
Crosland, David W.25576%71% — 81%
Iskra, Wayne17071%63% — 77%
Bryant, John Milo15970%62% — 76%
Kessler, Elizabeth A.15168%60% — 75%
Jones, David M.14878%70% — 84%
Niburg, Rebecca13958%50% — 66%
Rubenstein, John S.13146%38% — 54%
Kanellakos, Thanos12855%47% — 64%
Snow, Thomas G.12591%85% — 95%
Schmidt, Paul W.11684%77% — 90%
Verma, Dinesh C.11146%37% — 55%
Koelsch, David C.11195%89% — 97%
Lee, June11045%36% — 54%
Carbone, Nina M.10081%72% — 87%
Burman, Lawrence O.9392%85% — 96%
Bowens, Tanisha8870%60% — 79%
Koelsch, David C.8892%84% — 96%
Churchill, Joan V.8628%20% — 38%
Lee, Amy T.8160%50% — 70%
Vargas-Padilla, Nelson A.7666%55% — 75%
How to cite this page

Figures on this page belong to one monthly release and are replaced whole by the next. The release label and the data cutoff are part of the citation for that reason: without them the number cannot be checked later.

Asylum Beacon. Cameroon. EOIR Case Data, U.S. DOJ FOIA Library, release 2026-08, data through 2026-08-31. https://asylumbeacon.com/en/nationality/CM

Methodology in full

Data comes from the monthly EOIR Case Data release (U.S. DOJ FOIA Library). This service is not affiliated with the U.S. government and does not give legal advice. The release lags by roughly a month, so check ACIS or Respondent Access for your current case status. The source has known gaps, including among relief applications: if something is missing here, that does not mean it is missing from your case.