Skip to content
Asylum BeaconU.S. immigration court data

Judge Videla, Gabriel C.

MIAMI — IMMIGRATION COURT

No hearings scheduled ahead

Last hearing
November 6, 2024
Next hearing
none scheduled
Last decision
December 13, 2023
Courts worked at: 17

Worked here before

The periods overlap, and that is not an error: a judge hears cases at a new court while still closing out old ones at the previous one. Each row answers "when did this judge work here", not "from when to when did they serve here".

Status is derived from the court calendar: whether the judge has hearings scheduled after the release cutoff. The EOIR release carries no personnel data, so retirement, removal, elevation to the BIA and extended absence cannot be told apart — only what the data shows is stated here. Hearings are scheduled two to three years out, so an empty calendar for a working judge is rare; for judges who went quiet in the last few months it may still be an artifact of the cutoff, which lags by about a month. The lookup table's "active" flag is not used: it disagrees with the calendar for a third of judges.

24%

Asylum grant rate

of 5,600 decisions · FY1977–FY2022

95% interval: 23%25%

granted:
1,364
denied:
4,236

The period has closed

This judge no longer hears cases, so the figure describes FY1977–FY2022 — not what happens in the court today. Asylum rules and the mix of cases have changed since.

How this percentage is calculated
Grant rate = granted / (granted + denied). Administrative closures, withdrawals, abandonment and "not adjudicated" are excluded from the denominator. The unit of count is a decision per proceeding, not per application: applicants almost always file asylum, withholding and CAT protection together. Withholding and CAT grants are counted separately from asylum. U.S. fiscal year: October 1 – September 30.

How this compares

  • This judge24% (5,600)
  • The whole court — MIAMI — IMMIGRATION COURT19% (104,037)
  • All U.S. courts33% (1,350,724)

This comparison does not adjust for which cases a judge was given: judges see different nationalities, different shares of detained respondents, and different rates of legal representation. A difference in percentages does not by itself mean identical cases were treated differently.

Trend by fiscal year

0%25%50%75%100%199420022007201220172022

U.S. fiscal year: October 1 – September 30.

Years with fewer than 10 decisions are not plotted (5): at that sample size the percentage is noise. They remain in the table.

Show as a table
Grant rate by fiscal year
Perioddecisionsgranted95% interval
FY20221937%19%59%
FY2021147%1%31%
FY20202976%4%9%
FY20194598%6%11%
FY201832110%7%14%
FY201715514%10%21%
FY20163944%29%59%
FY2015157%1%30%
FY20141741%22%64%
FY20134947%34%61%
FY20129241%32%52%
FY201114257%49%65%
FY201010158%49%68%
FY200913551%43%59%
FY200815455%47%63%
FY200714871%63%78%
FY200613052%43%60%
FY200520345%38%52%
FY200418249%42%56%
FY200325131%25%37%
FY200223328%23%34%
FY200123533%27%39%
FY200027030%24%35%
FY199926418%14%23%
FY199833115%11%19%
FY199737610%8%14%
FY19964015%3%8%
FY19954319%7%12%
FY199412715%10%22%
FY199310%0%79%
FY199220%0%66%
FY199030%0%56%
FY198920%0%66%
FY198710%0%79%

By applicant nationality

Grant rate by nationality, largest volumes first
Nationalitydecisionsgranted95% interval
CHINA1,82823%21%25%
GUATEMALA5386%4%8%
HONDURAS42911%9%15%
EL SALVADOR28215%12%20%
ALBANIA17453%46%61%
INDIA1618%5%13%
BANGLADESH15512%8%18%
MAURITANIA15019%14%26%
HAITI12813%8%20%
PAKISTAN12217%12%25%
Former Countries11960%51%68%
RUSSIA10846%37%56%
GUINEA10736%28%46%
COLOMBIA6755%43%67%
GHANA612%0%9%

How long a case takes

How long it took from service of the NTA to the decision on the application, for the cases this judge has already finished.

19 mo

median

half of cases: 10—32 mo

based on 5,600 cases

NTA-to-decision duration by fiscal year
Decided inCasesmedianhalf of cases, mo
FY202029720 mo1441
FY201945933 mo2341
FY201832126 mo2132
FY201715519 mo1028
FY2016398 mo531
FY20134943 mo2481
FY20129238 mo2959
FY201114231 mo2258
FY201010128 mo1845
FY200913531 mo1845

Duration runs from the NTA date (charging document served) to the decision on the application. Median, not mean: the distribution has a long right tail. Cases decided this year may have begun a decade ago, so duration by year of decision is not a forecast for a case filed today.

The queue

Cases with no decision yet. A different figure from the duration of completed cases: quick cases leave the queue first, so the long ones accumulate among those still waiting.

No undecided cases in this release.

What became of appeals to the BIA

An immigration judge's decision can be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals. This is what the Board did with those appeals. A high share of reversals and remands tells a different story than a low grant rate alone.

What became of appeals to the BIA
BIA decisionAppeals
Dismiss Appeal/Affirm IJ's Decision2,058
Denied1,013
Remand598
Summary Affirmance550
Termination322
Dismissed (Grant V/D 30 days)201
Summarily Dismiss109
Withdrawal of Appeal87
Lacks Jurisdiction - BIA75
Other73
Summary Dismissal (e) no brief72
SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE/VD70
Granted68
Sustain40
Dismissed (Voluntary Departure Granted)28
Background Check Remand27
Coercive Population Control25
Terminate-DHS PD23
Dismiss as Untimely22
Temporary Protected Status20
Dismiss Soriano19
Deferred Enforced Departure16
Grant with no Remand11
Summary Dismissal (G) untimely or waived appeal10
Moot Bond7
Rejection6
SUMMARY DISMISSAL - BOTH (a) & (e)6
Continued6
Summary Dismissal (a) inad reason on appeal5
Granted Soriano5
ROP Returned to Court to correct deficiency4
Conditional Grant--CPC Asylum2
Administratively Closed2
Denied Soriano1
Other Soriano1

Data comes from the monthly EOIR Case Data release (U.S. DOJ FOIA Library). This service is not affiliated with the U.S. government and does not provide legal advice. The data lags by roughly a month; for current case status use ACIS and Respondent Access. The source is known to have missing records, including relief applications — absent data does not mean it is absent from your case.